0 LIKES LikeUnLike
U.S. officials are sighted worrying approximately Pakistan's cooperation for militants battling within Afghanistan, remarking help incentives would do little towards distort Islamabad's affairs, which stem from panic of India. Months before the Obama management this year advised Congress to supply $2 billion in infantry help to Pakistan as part of an ongoing scheme to win over a reluctant partner in the conflict on terror, Washington's peak diplomat in Islamabad had flatly alerted that a cash-for-cooperation set about would not ever work. "There is no chance that Pakistan will view enhanced assistance levels in any field as sufficient compensation for abandoning support to these groups, which it sees as an important part of its national security apparatus against India," Patterson wrote in a Sept. After all these cables from wikileaks, what do you say about that? Does America really think that Pakistan is supporting militants?
Tags: Pakistan, support, Terrorists, wikileaks
The storm created by whistle blower website WikiLeaks is not going calm down very soon, as the 2.5 lakh-odd confidential documents released by the site has become a treasure trove of news for the media world over.
The WikiLeaks documents say that Pakistan's Army and ISI are covertly sponsoring four militant groups, including the Taliban and Mumbai attackers Lashkar-e-Taiba, and will not abandon these groups for any amount of money from the US.
Citing a secret review written by an American envoy to Islamabad, a Guardian report that Pakistan had received more than USD 16 billion in American aid since 2001, but "there is no chance that Pakistan will view enhanced assistance... as sufficient compensation for abandoning support to these groups".
Report (0) (0) | 12 years, 7 month(s) ago
Latest activity: 13 years, 2 month(s) ago. This question has 1 answers.